Senior Pathologist (AI Clinical Evaluation)

Gramian Consulting Group · Brazil

RemotoContratoSênior

Publicada há 1 hora

Sobre a vaga

Gramian Consultancy is a boutique consultancy specializing in IT professional services and engineering talent solutions. With a strong background in software engineering and leadership, we help companies build high-performing teams by matching them with professionals who truly fit their needs.

Role Overview

We are looking for an experienced Senior Pathologist to contribute to an AI training and evaluation project focused on clinical reasoning, diagnostic accuracy, pathology interpretation, longitudinal chart review, and patient safety.

The role involves creating and reviewing complex pathology-focused clinical tasks, long-chart scenarios, gold-standard answers, and evaluation rubrics. You will assess whether outputs reflect accurate diagnostic reasoning, appropriate interpretation of pathology findings, sound clinical correlation, complete documentation, and clinically defensible conclusions.

CONTRACT: Contractor assignment, 12 weeks

COMMITMENT: Part-time or Full-time (20-40h/week)

LOCATIONS: Remote - Bangladesh, Brazil, Colombia, Egypt, Ghana, India, Indonesia, Nigeria, Turkey

PROCESS: The selection will be made based on an online questionnaire, 60min MCQ test, and resume/education/certification

Key Responsibilities

  • Develop high-difficulty pathology and laboratory medicine cases and benchmark tasks.
  • Review pathology reports, laboratory findings, clinical history, and longitudinal medical records.
  • Identify clinically significant findings, inconsistencies, missing information, diagnostic risks, and documentation gaps.
  • Evaluate AI-generated outputs for diagnostic accuracy, clinical relevance, terminology, completeness, and patient safety.
  • Create gold-standard answers and clinically defensible reference solutions.
  • Assess whether pathology interpretations are appropriately correlated with clinical context and other diagnostic findings.
  • Review differential diagnoses and identify unsupported or unsafe conclusions.
  • Apply structured rubrics to evaluate reasoning, terminology, documentation quality, and clinical accuracy.
  • Participate in peer review and calibration of complex or ambiguous cases.
  • Incorporate feedback and refine tasks through iterative review cycles.

Leu e ficou na dúvida? A nota responde.

Ver minha nota